HINTON v. MITCHELL

No. WD 54764.

962 S.W.2d 467 (1998)

William HINTON, Appellant, v. Cranston MITCHELL, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Hinton, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephen D. Hawke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and HANNA and RIEDERER, JJ.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Hinton appeals from the dismissal of his writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We dismiss the appeal.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would lack precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases