U.S. v. EDMO

No. 96-30215.

140 F.3d 1289 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Del EDMO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin Wagner, Idaho Falls, Idaho, for defendant-appellant.

Betty H. Richardson, United States Attorney, Boise, Idaho, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: ALARCON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

ALARCON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Del Edmo ("Edmo") appeals from the denial of his motions to suppress the results of a urine test and an incriminating statement made after officers of the Fort Hall Police Department requested a urine sample. Edmo contends that, in requiring him to submit to a urine test, the police violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches, his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination...

Let's get started


Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases