1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 142 F.3d
  5. 142 F.3d 1274 (1998)
 

HRE, INC. v. U.S.

No. 97-1197.

142 F.3d 1274 (1998)

HRE, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 29, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry D. Danforth, Watt, Tieder & Hoffar, L.L.P., McLean, VA, argued, for appellant.

Robert Steinbuch, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued, for appellee. On the brief were Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Paul S. Padda, Attorney.

Before RICH, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The question is whether the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("Board") correctly interpreted a government contract for renovation of a building as requiring the contractor to insulate certain piping. We agree with the Board's interpretation of the contract and we affirm its decision.

I.

The Department of Health and Human Services ("government") awarded a contract to HRE, Inc., for renovation of a federal

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases