1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 718 A.2d
  5. 718 A.2d 693 (1998)
 

HIMELFARB v. HARTFORD FIRE

No. 61, Sept. Term, 1998.

718 A.2d 693 (1998)

123 Md. App. 456

Herbert HIMELFARB et al. v. The HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

October 5, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin A. Klopman (M. Michael Cramer and Cramer & Klopman, Chartered, on the brief), Rockville, for appellants.

George E. Reede, Jr. (Donald L. Speidel, V. Timothy Bambrick and Niles, Barton & Wilmer, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before HOLLANDER and EYLER, JJ., and JAMES S. GETTY, Judge (retired, Specially Assigned).

EYLER, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether Herbert and Frances Himelfarb ("Himelfarbs"), appellants, complied with a proof of loss provision in an insurance policy issued by The Hartford Fire Insurance Company ("Hartford"), appellee. On appeal, the Himelfarbs challenge an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City granting Hartford's motion for summary judgment on the basis that the Himelfarbs had not submitted a complete proof of loss to Hartford within sixty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases