BISHOP v. EQUINOX INTERN. CORP.

Nos. 97-5161, 97-5167.

154 F.3d 1220 (1998)

James S. BISHOP, d/b/a Essence of Life, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL CORP., a Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 4, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Dorman, Dorman & Gilbert, P.A., Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mack J. Morgan, III (D. Kent Meyers with him on the brief), Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BALDOCK, BRORBY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.


LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of a trademark infringement and unfair competition action filed by James S. Bishop against Equinox International Corporation ("Equinox"), alleging a violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). We consider for this Circuit whether an accounting of profits pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) requires proof of actual damages.

Following a bench trial, the district court concluded that a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases