1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 586 N.W.2d
  5. 586 N.W.2d 787 (1998)
 

MITCHELL v. CITY OF OAKDALE

No. CX-98-607.

586 N.W.2d 787 (1998)

James MITCHELL, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF OAKDALE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 8, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Kelly, Stephen C. Kelly, Song Lo Fawcett, Bannigan & Kelly, P.A., St. Paul, for appellants.

Thomas J. Radio, Hinshaw & Culbertson, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY and HOLTAN, JJ.

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

Following the district court's order upholding a special assessment and dismissing their appeal, appellants' motion for a new trial was denied. In this appeal, appellants argue that the district court erred in not granting their motion for new trial because they were denied a full and fair opportunity to present their case. We conclude that this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to consider the merits of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases