Plaintiff brought this tort action seeking to hold defendant liable for injuries that plaintiff sustained on the job. The sole issue on appeal is whether defendant is immune from tort liability under ORS 656.018(4) (1993) as a client of a worker leasing company. Under the parties' arguments, that issue turns chiefly on whether plaintiff was employed on a temporary or permanent basis.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BAUGH v. MAINTENANCE AND MACH. ERECTORS
96-CV-0298-ST; CA A98634.
968 P.2d 392 (1998)
157 Or. App. 128
Robert H. BAUGH, Appellant, v. MAINTENANCE AND MACHINE ERECTORS, INC., an Oregon corporation, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted May 11, 1998.
Decided November 4, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Steven D. Bryant, Redmond, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Bryant, Emerson & Fitch.
Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang & Smith.
Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
