CRANDELL v. BUNNELL

No. 96-56644.

144 F.3d 1213 (1998)

Kenneth CRANDELL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Bill J. BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 19, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Oeser and Paul C. Ament, Los Angeles, CA, for respondents-appellants.

John W. Poulos, Davis, CA; Michael V. White, Santa Monica, CA, for petitioner-appellee.

Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Crandell petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. He alleges that he was faced with an unconstitutional choice of incompetent counsel or no counsel at all. We previously held that Crandell's petition asserted facts sufficient to state a claim and remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing. Crandell v. Bunnell, 25 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). Crandell's claim was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases