1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 971 P.2d
  5. 971 P.2d 383 (1998)
 

BOBBY BEROSINI, LTD. v. PETA

No. 29103.

971 P.2d 383 (1998)

BOBBY BEROSINI, LTD., A Nevada Corporation, and Bohumil Berousek, a/k/a Bobby Berosini, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, a/k/a PETA, A Delaware Non-Profit Corporation; and Jeanne Roush, Respondents/Cross-Appellants, and Performing Animal Welfare Society, a/k/a PAWS, A California Non-Profit Corporation, and Pat Derby, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Rehearing Denied February 26, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McKnight & Hendrix, Las Vegas, for Appellants/Cross-Respondents.

Wright, Judd & Winckler, Las Vegas; Hirschkop & Associates, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondents/Cross-Appellants PETA and Roush.

Foley & Jones and Daniel T. Foley, Las Vegas, for Respondents PAWS and Derby.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This case involves an appeal and cross-appeal from the district court's order granting respondents/cross-appellants, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS), $144,000.00 and $42,000.00, respectively, in attorney's fees, and $228,625.48 and $6589.91, respectively, in costs.

On appeal, Bobby Berosini (Berosini) contends that the district court abused its discretion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases