Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15), robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10), robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25).
Defendant contends that Supreme Court improperly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the victim, the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.