1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 10 F.Supp.2d
  5. 10 F.Supp.2d 124 (1998)
 

GENERAL CLUTCH CORP. v. LOWRY

Nos. 3:93CV1893 (JBA), 3:94CV2200 (JBA).

10 F.Supp.2d 124 (1998)

GENERAL CLUTCH CORP., Plaintiff, v. David A. LOWRY & CEMA Technologies, Inc., Defendants. GENERAL CLUTCH CORP., Plaintiff, v. Yevgeny NOVIKOV (Eugene Novin), Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur G. Larkin, Gilbert, Segall & Young, Stamford, CT, John H. Chapman, Tenzer Greenblatt, Stamford, CT, for General Clutch Corp.

John H. Chapman, Tenzer Greenblatt, Stamford, CT, for General Clutch Corp.

Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr., Gene S. Winter, St. Onge, Steward, Johnston & Reens, Stamford, CT, Glenn S. Gitomer, Janeen Olsen Dougherty, McCausland, Keen & Buckman, Radnor, PA, for David P. Lowry, CEMA Technologies, Inc.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [docs. 150-1, 150-2]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants, David A. Lowry ("Mr. Lowry") and CEMA Technologies, Inc. ("CEMA") move for Judgment as a Matter of Law under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) following a bifurcated trial and jury verdict against both Lowry and CEMA for violation of the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Conn. Gen.Stat., § 35-51 et seq...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases