CATO v. CROWN FINANCIAL, LTD.

No. COA98-121.

508 S.E.2d 822 (1998)

Marlene H. CATO, Plaintiff, v. CROWN FINANCIAL, LTD. (formerly Cato Financial, Ltd.), Defendant, and Arnold Eugene Walser and Shirley Turner Walser, Intervening/Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 15, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, by James G. Exum, Jr., Greensboro, and Matthew Sawchak, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Adams Kleemeier Hagan Hannah & Fouts, P.L.L.C., by Amiel J. Rossabi and J. Scott Hale, Greensboro, for defendants-appellees.


EAGLES, Chief Judge.

We first consider whether the trial court erred in retrying this case de novo. Plaintiff first argues that the Walsers'"broadside exception" to the receiver's report was too vague to justify review and should be treated as having waived the right to review. Second, plaintiff argues that the trial should not have been de novo and that the receiver's report should have been accorded deference. Plaintiff contends that the trial court should have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases