OBERT v. DAHL

No. C3-97-1023.

574 N.W.2d 747 (1998)

Mary A. OBERT, Appellant, v. Bradley DAHL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted April 14, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Neilson, Rooney & Neilson, Ltd., Arden Hills, for Appellant.

Jeffrey P. Hicken, Jensen, Hicken & Scott, P.A., Anoka, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., and HUSPENI and KLAPHAKE, JJ.


OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Mary A. Obert challenges the grant of summary judgment to respondent Bradley Dahl, dismissing her claims for reimbursement of money she spent in assisting Dahl to purchase a house and for other equitable relief. In granting summary judgment to Dahl, the court concluded that the "anti-palimony" statutes, Minn.Stat. §§ 513.075,.076 (1996) prohibited enforcement of any non-written property contract between the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases