1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 9 F.Supp.2d
  5. 9 F.Supp.2d 120 (1998)
 

McDONALD v. TIMEX CORP.

No. CIV.A.3:97CV271(JBA).

9 F.Supp.2d 120 (1998)

John K. McDONALD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TIMEX CORPORATION and Middlebury Office Park Limited Partnership, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 31, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Pollock, Bai, Pollock & Coyne, Bridgeport, CT, for Plaintiffs.

James K. Robertson, Jr., John D. Yarbrough, Jr., Carmody & Torrance, Waterbury, CT, Baker & Botts, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [doc. 6]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are owners of residential property adjoining a long-time manufacturing facility of defendant Timex Corporation ("Timex") in Middlebury, Connecticut, at which Timex manufactured watches, watch parts and gyroscopes. Timex's manufacturing activities included metal finishing and electroplating operations involving the use of metals, as well as solvents to clean parts and equipment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases