1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 573 N.W.2d
  5. 573 N.W.2d 704 (1998)
 

MOHRENWEISER v. BLOMER

No. CX-97-1231.

573 N.W.2d 704 (1998)

Gary MOHRENWEISER & Greg Mohrenweiser, d/b/a G & G Partnership, Respondents, v. Mavis BLOMER, Respondent, Paul Blomer, Respondent, Gordon F. Stalker, et al., defendants and cross-claim plaintiffs, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 19, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil C. Franz, Neils, Franz & Chirhart, P.A., St. Cloud, for respondents Mohrenweiser.

Mavis (Blomer) Rule, Isle, pro se.

Paul E. Blomer, Onamia, pro se.

John E. Simonett, William J. Everett, Greene Espel, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, C.J., and RANDALL and FOLEY, JJ.

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY*, Judge.

Appellants contend the trial court erroneously allowed the jury to determine the enforceability of a contract that was unenforceable as a matter of law. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

This case arose out of two agreements to purchase the Blomer farm. Respondents Mavis and Paul Blomer owned a 160-acre farm in Mille Lacs County. In 1993...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases