DAHL v. ST. JOHN

93-00770 CV; CA A92582.

955 P.2d 315 (1998)

152 Or. App. 748

Mancel V. DAHL and Barbara B. Dahl, Respondents, v. Edward ST. JOHN and Mercedes E. St. John, husband and wife, Appellants. Edward ST. JOHN and Mercedes E. St. John, husband and wife, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Jack SIMINGTON and Simington Products Company, Third-Party Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 25, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas J. Richmond argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants. With him on the brief were Kellington, Krack, Richmond, Blackhurst & Sutton, LLP.

Mark Runnels argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Lisette M. LeBourveau and Spencer, Runnels, MacArthur & Porras LLP.

Before LANDAU, P.J., and LEESON and HASELTON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiffs damages, assigning error to the award of all of plaintiffs' attorney fees incurred in connection with plaintiffs' claim for fraud. ORS 19.010 (1995); ORS 19.020 (1995). We affirm.

On May 11, 1994, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint for fraud, alleging that defendants misrepresented the condition of an engine in a 1954 motor home that defendants sold to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sought compensatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases