Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.
Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion "in the interests of justice and upon a showing of good cause" (22 NYCRR 202.17 [h]) in allowing plaintiff's treating physician to testify despite plaintiff's failure to provide defendants with a medical report from him. Defendants had been provided with the report of plaintiff's treating physician to the no-fault...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.