Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for youthful offender status. Because defendant was convicted upon his guilty pleas of three counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [b]), one of which was an armed felony (CPL 1.20 [41]), he was eligible for youthful offender status only if the court found "mitigating circumstances that bear directly upon the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.