1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 29 F.Supp.2d
  5. 29 F.Supp.2d 1152 (1998)
 

AUSTRALIA VISION SERVS. v. DIOPITCS MEDICAL PRODS.

No. CV 98-1976 RAP (JGx).

29 F.Supp.2d 1152 (1998)

AUSTRALIA VISION SERVICES PTY. LTD, Plaintiff, v. DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., and Henry Lane, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

December 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Shapiro, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff.

Thomas B. Haverstock, Jonathan O. Owens, Haverstock & Owens, Palo Alto, CA, for defendants.

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY OF THE '083 PATENT

PAEZ, District Judge.

I.

Introduction

Plaintiff Australia Vision Services ("Vision Services") brought this action for damages against defendants Dioptics Medical Products and Henry Lane (collectively "Dioptics") alleging willful infringement of Design Patent No. 387,083 (" ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases