Order unanimously reversed in the interest of justice without costs and new trial granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although Supreme Court apparently thought that the parties had stipulated that defendant Robert W. Bonter was negligent, that his negligence was the proximate cause of an injury to plaintiff that necessitated back surgery, and that plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), both parties' attorneys...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
