1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 61 Cal.App.4th
  5. 61 Cal.App.4th 1091 (1998)
 

PETRINI v. MOHASCO CORP.

Docket No. A076840.

61 Cal.App.4th 1091 (1998)

THERESE PETRINI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MOHASCO CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

February 27, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brayton, Harley, Curtis, Philip A. Harley, James L. Oberman and Timothy J. Walton for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Haight, Brown & Bonesteel, Roy G. Weatherup, Lisa L. Oberg, Jon M. Kasimov, Caroline E. Chan and T. Sky Woodward for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

LAMBDEN, J.

Therese Petrini appeals from the summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Mohasco Corporation. She contends the trial court erred in concluding that no triable issue of fact exists to establish that defendant Mohasco Corporation (Mohasco) is a successor in interest to William Volker & Company (Volker). We agree and reverse the judgment.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases