TAYLOR v. JACK

WCB No. 91-16775; CA A91856.

957 P.2d 194 (1998)

153 Or. App. 411

In the Matter of the Compensation of Charles C. Taylor, Claimant. Charles C. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. Fred W. JACK, Charles McGlinchey, SAIF Corporation, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 15, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale C. Johnson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore, Johnson & Jensen.

Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Consumer and Business Services.

William J. Blitz, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Fred W. Jack and Charles McGlinchey.

No appearance for SAIF Corporation.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and DEITS, C.J., and HASELTON, J.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss request for review. Oldham v. Plumlee, 151 Or.App. 402, 950 P.2d 918<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases