Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Assuming for purposes of the suppression motion that the defendant's allegations were true and that the contraband was located beneath a crate on which the defendant was seated, the suppression court properly denied the motion without a hearing. The defendant failed to allege in his motion papers that he exercised any expectation of privacy in the crate that was searched (see, People v Mendoza,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
