INTEL CORP. v. RENFRO

96-02773, 95-11919; CA A98921.

963 P.2d 173 (1998)

155 Or. App. 447

In the Matter of the Compensation of Catherine G. Renfro, Claimant, INTEL CORPORATION and AIG Claim Services, Petitioners, v. Catherine G. RENFRO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald W. Atwood, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Robert Sola argued the cause for the respondent. On the brief was Hank McCurdy.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.


HASELTON, Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, which set aside the denial of an aggravation claim. Central to the Board's holding was its determination that, because of the 1995 amendment to ORS 656.273(1), claimant was not required to prove diminished wage-earning capacity in order to establish a compensable aggravation of an unscheduled condition. We conclude that the Board erred in that regard and, consequently, reverse and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases