1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 145 F.3d
  5. 145 F.3d 986 (1998)
 

HINDMAN v. TRANSKRIT CORP.

No. 97-3491.

145 F.3d 986 (1998)

Keith HINDMAN, Appellant, v. TRANSKRIT CORPORATION, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided June 1, 1998.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied July 1, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe D. Byars, Jr., Fort Smith, AR, argued, for Appellant.

Charles W. Reynolds, Little Rock, AR, argued (Monte D. Estes, on the brief), for Appellee.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, LOKEN, Circuit Judge, and PRATT, District Judge.

PRATT, District Judge.

Keith Hindman appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States district court, granting summary judgment in favor of Transkrit Corporation, and thereby dismissing his claim that he was demoted in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (1994). Hindman argues that the district court erred in finding "no evidence from which to conclude that plaintiff was replaced by a younger worker." A review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases