1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 957 P.2d
  5. 957 P.2d 173 (1998)
 

STULL v. HOKE

9405-03716; CA A86270.

957 P.2d 173 (1998)

153 Or. App. 261

Barry Joe STULL, Appellant, v. Mary M. HOKE, Nancy C. Antal and Brownstein, Rask, Sweeney, Grim, Kerr & DeSylvia, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 1, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry Joe Stull filed the brief pro se.

Mark W. Potter, Edward S. McGlone III and Wallace & Klor, P.C., Portland, filed the brief for respondent Mary M. Hoke.

Donald W. McEwen, Janice N. Turner and McEwen, Gisvold, Rankin, Carter & Streinz, Portland, filed the brief for respondents Nancy C. Antal and Brownstein, Rask, Sweeney, Grim, Kerr & DeSylvia.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the ORCP 21 dismissal of his claims for intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, fraud, conversion and assumpsit. His action is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or. 72, 948 P.2d 722 (1997). We had held that the action was commenced on May 31, 1994, and, thus, that all claims in the complaint were time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases