1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 18 F.Supp.2d
  5. 18 F.Supp.2d 1110 (1998)
 

DANIELS v. PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC.

No. 98-836-IEG(CGA).

18 F.Supp.2d 1110 (1998)

Devin DANIELS, Bryce Clements, and Daimon Fullerton, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

August 7, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman B. Blumenthal, Blumenthal Ostroff and Markham, San Diego, CA, for Devin Daniels, Bryce Clements, Daimon Fullerton.

Gerald L. McMahon, Seltzer Caplan Wilkins and McMahon, San Diego, CA, for Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Philip Morris Inc.

Robert C. Wright, Wright and LEstrange, San Diego, CA, RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp., RJR Nabisco Inc.

Willaim S. Boggs, Gray Cary Ware and Freidenrich, San Diego, CA, for Lorillard, Inc.

Duane Tyler, Coughlan Semmer and Lipman, San Diego, CA, for UST, Inc., U.S. Tobacco Co.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

On April 2, 1998, plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court against defendant tobacco companies based on a single claim of unfair and deceptive business practices under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.1 In the complaint, plaintiffs allege that (a) defendants' advertising practices are deceptive because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases