1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 963 P.2d
  5. 963 P.2d 149 (1998)
 

ETTNER v. CITY OF MEDFORD

96-2123-L-3; CA A98376.

963 P.2d 149 (1998)

155 Or. App. 435

Kristen A. ETTNER, Appellant, v. CITY OF MEDFORD, a municipal corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee S. Werdell, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Werdell & Hanson.

Kimberlee C. Morrow, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Matt Farmer and Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.

HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the allowance of summary judgment against her claims for employment discrimination, ORS chapter 659, which arise from her termination as a probationary firefighter with defendant City of Medford. The trial court determined that plaintiff's action was precluded because the exclusive means to challenge the alleged unlawful discharge was writ of review. ORS 34.102. We conclude that writ of review was not available...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases