Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the amount of restitution from $285,920 to $184,492; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the delay in imposing sentence was so unreasonable as to deprive the court of jurisdiction. This contention is raised for the first time on appeal and is therefore unpreserved for appellate review. As this Court explained in People v Marshall...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
