PER CURIAM.
This action is before us on plaintiff's original complaint for habeas corpus. Plaintiff argues that his detention resulting from a parole violation is illegal because the Parole Board failed to comply with M.C.L. § 791.240a(1); M.S.A. § 28.2310(1)(1). We disagree and, therefore, deny plaintiff's request for a writ of habeas corpus.
In 1992, plaintiff was convicted as a third-offense habitual offender of breaking and entering, fraudulent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
