1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 3 F.Supp.2d
  5. 3 F.Supp.2d 1102 (1998)
 

INTEX RECREATION CORP. v. HASBRO, INC.

No. CV 96-0533 ABC (MCX).

3 F.Supp.2d 1102 (1998)

INTEX RECREATION CORP., Plaintiff, v. HASBRO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

February 20, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Makous, Daniel DeCarlo, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff/Petitioner.

Monique Cordray, Robert Hillman, Fish & Richardson, Boston, MA, for Defendant/Respondent.

ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication re:

(i) Invalidity of Claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 5,575,738;

(ii) Invalidity of U.S. Design Patent No. D-366-085;

(iii) Non-Infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. D-366-085; and Plaintiff's Motion for Bifurcation

COLLINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Adjudication re: (i) Invalidity of Claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 5,575,738; (ii) Invalidity of U.S. Design Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases