KLINGENSCHMITT v. KLINGENSCHMITT

No. C5-98-398.

580 N.W.2d 512 (1998)

In re the Marriage of Helmut KLINGENSCHMITT, petitioner, Appellant, v. Michelle Lynn KLINGENSCHMITT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 30, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helmut Klingenschmitt, Inver Grove Heights, appellant pro se.

Michelle Klingenschmitt, Cottage Grove, respondent pro se.

James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, Vance B. Grannis, III, Assistant County Attorney, Hastings, respondent Dakota County.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and CRIPPEN, and HARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Helmut Klingenschmitt challenges the decisions of an administrative law judge (ALJ) setting the amount of his ongoing child care obligation and, in the absence of a motion, ordering that he must contribute toward the child care expenses of respondent Michelle Klingenschmitt. The ALJ determined that appellant's child care obligation, previously terminated at the request of respondent, renewed automatically without a motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases