RICKE v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INS. CO.

No. C8-97-2071.

577 N.W.2d 512 (1998)

Darla RICKE, Respondent, v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Sheridan, Robert H. Magie, III, Magie, Andresen, Haag, Paciotti, Butterworth & McCarthy, P.A., Duluth, for appellant.

Darrold E. Persson, David A. Arndt, Matonich & Persson, Chartered, Hibbing, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and PETERSON and MANSUR, JJ.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

On appeal from a summary judgment, an underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier argues that its insured was not entitled to settle her claims against all defendants and then claim UIM benefits based on a later stipulation to liability and damages because the settlement payment equaled her total damages. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Darla Ricke was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned and operated by Shane Lokken when the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases