SCIANGULA v. CITY OF NEW YORK


250 A.D.2d 833 (1998)

673 N.Y.S.2d 454

Charles Sciangula, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 26, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As the defendant correctly contends, assuming arguendo that a violation of Labor Law § 27-a (3) could constitute a valid predicate for a claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, the plaintiff has failed as a matter of law to set forth sufficient factual allegations to make out such a violation (see generally, Hartnett v New York City Tr. Auth.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases