Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
As the defendant correctly contends, assuming arguendo that a violation of Labor Law § 27-a (3) could constitute a valid predicate for a claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, the plaintiff has failed as a matter of law to set forth sufficient factual allegations to make out such a violation (see generally, Hartnett v New York City Tr. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.