WINDSCHITL v. WINDSCHITL

No. CX-97-2184.

579 N.W.2d 499 (1998)

Harold WINDSCHITL, Respondent, v. Ervin J. WINDSCHITL, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 16, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Thomas Wilson, Gislason, Dosland, Hunter & Malecki, P.L.L.P., New Ulm, for respondent.

J. Brian O'Leary, O'Leary & Moritz, Chartered, Springfield, for appellants.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and CRIPPEN and MANSUR, JJ.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

Respondent Harold Windschitl brought this action against appellants Ervin J. Windschitl and Barbara A. Windschitl, seeking to recover money owed to him under a contract. Based on the trial court's conclusion that the statute of limitations did not bar any part of respondent's claim, judgment was entered in favor of respondent. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

On December 4, 1975, appellants Ervin J....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases