1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 509 S.E.2d
  5. 509 S.E.2d 569 (1998)
 

CHARLESTON URBAN RENEWAL v. COURTLAND CO.

No. 25015.

509 S.E.2d 569 (1998)

203 W.Va. 528

CHARLESTON URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic, Petitioner Below, Appellee, v. The COURTLAND COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, Defendant Below, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Decided October 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joyce F. Ofsa, Esq., Trina L. Leone, Esq., Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for Appellee.

Charles B. Dollison, Esq., Kenneth E. Webb, Jr., Esq., John Teare, Esq., Geoffry A. Haddad, Esq., Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for Appellant.

STARCHER, Justice:

In the instant case, the Courtland Company ("Courtland") challenges the authority of the Charleston Urban Redevelopment Authority ("CURA") to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire land ("the Courtland Property") that is owned by Courtland and is located in downtown Charleston.

CURA wants to acquire and develop the Courtland Property as part of a unified business district, pursuant to the provisions of CURA's redevelopment plan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases