STATE v. BYNUM

No. C6-97-2022.

579 N.W.2d 485 (1998)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. James BYNUM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 18, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, St. Paul, for respondent.

Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Beverly J. Benson, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Craig E. Cascarano, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and HARTEN, and SCHULTZ, JJ.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court's refusal to suppress evidence, arguing there was no probable cause to support the underlying warrant. We affirm.

FACTS

In February 1997, an undercover Minneapolis police officer arranged to purchase crack cocaine from a drug dealer. The dealer's supplier, appellant James Bynum, arrived at the scene of the buy in an Oldsmobile. Appellant sold the dealer one ounce of crack cocaine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases