1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 501 S.E.2d
  5. 501 S.E.2d 561 (1998)
 

WALLACE v. SCAFFEE

No. A98A0625.

501 S.E.2d 561 (1998)

232 Ga. App. 188

WALLACE v. SCAFFEE et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

April 13, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Serio & Swilley, Salvatore J. Serio, Conyers, for appellant.

Harger W. Hoyt, Conyers, for appellees.

POPE, Presiding Judge.

In this boundary line dispute, both the plaintiff, Jimmy Wallace, and the defendants, James Scaffee, Ronald Kerbow, and Miriam Kerbow, moved for summary judgment. Relying on separate surveys and expert opinions, each party advocated a different boundary line and claimed the undisputed facts showed as a matter of law that its proposed boundary line was the correct one. The trial court denied both motions for summary judgment. In that same order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases