Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) and tampering with physical evidence (Penal Law § 215.40 [2]). We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court improperly curtailed his efforts to establish that someone else may have committed the crime. Although a defendant has the right to introduce evidence showing a clear link between a third...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
