1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 733 A.2d
  5. 733 A.2d 312 (1998)
 

VAN DE WALLE v. SALOMON BROTHERS INC.

C.A. No. 9894.

733 A.2d 312 (1998)

Charles R. VAN DE WALLE, Plaintiff, v. SALOMON BROTHERS INC., Lehman Brothers Inc., formerly known as Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided: November 25, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pamela S. Tikellis of Chimicles, Jacobsen & Tikellis, Wilmington, Delaware, of counsel, James R. Malone, Jr. and Pamela M. Nicolaysen, Haverford, Pennsylvania, for Plaintiff.

Robert K. Payson of Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Delaware, of counsel, Lyndon M. Tretter of Davis Weber & Edwards, New York, New York, for Defendants.

OPINION

STEELE, Vice Chancellor.

Plaintiff Charles R. Van De Walle ("Van de Walle") invokes § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"),1 to support a claim that the Prospectus of L.F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin Holdings, Inc. ("L.F. Rothschild") improperly failed to describe certain risky business ventures contemplated by management at the time of L.F. Rothschild's initial public offering (IPO) of common stock. Van...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases