LAKEHEAD PIPELINE CO. v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COM'N

No. 3-97-0524.

696 N.E.2d 345 (1998)

296 Ill. App.3d 942

231 Ill.Dec. 353

LAKEHEAD PIPELINE COMPANY, Limited Partnership, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, Illinois Department of Agriculture, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency McHenry County, Kendall County, Kane County, Village of Mokena, City of Woodstock, City of Piano, Communities Against the Pipeline, Robert Pollack, Respondents-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 16, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald A. Ambrose (argued), Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Gregory A. Wheeler, Lakehead Pipe Line Co., Inc., for Lakehead Pipe Line Co.

Kathleen Nolan and James E. Weging (argued), Office of General Counsel-ICC, Chicago, for Illinois Commerce Com'n.

Karen L. McNaught, Asst. Atty. Gen., Springfield, for Illinois Dept. of Agriculture.

Stacey C. Hollo, Illinois Dept. Of Transp., Springfield, for Illinois Dept. of Transp.

Mary K. Walter, McHenry County Asst. State's Atty., Woodstock, Michael D. Sullivan, Terry Sullivan, The Sullivan Firm, Ltd., Rolling Meadows, for McHenry County.

Christopher N. Wise, McKeown, Fitzgerald, Zollner & Buck, Joliet, for Village of Mokena, Will County.

Timothy McCann, State's Atty., Yorkville, for Kendall County,

David R. Akemann, St. Charles, Patricia Johnson Lord, Chief: Civil Div., St. Charles, Michele L. Niermann, Asst. State's Atty., St. Charles, for Kane County.

Michael T. Caldwell, Caldwell, Berner & Caldwell, Woodstock, for City of Woodstock.

James R. Schirott, Schirott & Luetkehans, P.C., Itasca, for David M. Hughes.

Thomas W. Grant, Yorkville, for City of Piano.

Jeffrey D. Greenspan (argued), David Lincoln Ader, Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Cope & Bush, P.C., Chicago, for Communities Against The Pipeline.

John J. Kim, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Michele F. Joy, General Counsel/Assoc. of Oil Pipe Lines, Washington, DC, Alan B. Friedlander, Senior Atty,/American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae American Petroleum Institute, Assoc. of Oil Pipe Lines.

Richard A. Neufeld, Milner Fenerty, Calgary, Alberta, CN, for amicus curiae Canadian Assoc. of Petroleum Producers.

Boyd J. Springer, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Chicago, for amicus curiae Amoco Oil Co.

Brady C. Williamson, Debbie K. Lerner, LaFollette & Sinykin, Madison, WI, for amicus curiae Petroleum Marketers Assoc. of Wisconsin.

Michele Odorizzi, Stephen J. Mattson, Barbara E. Cohen, Mayer, Brown & Piatt, Chicago, for amicus curiae Quantum Pipeline Co.


Justice BRESLIN delivered the opinion of the court:

This controversy concerns a challenge to the Illinois Commerce Commission's (Commission) authority to regulate a proposed interstate pipeline under the Common Carrier by Pipeline Law (Pipeline Law) (220 ILCS 5/15-100 et seq. (West 1996)). Petitioner Lakehead Pipe Line Company (Lakehead) and amici curiae assert that the Commission exceeded its lawful authority when reviewing Lakehead's application for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases