Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
The defendant contends that the officer's testimony at the suppression hearing was incredible and "patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections". We disagree. It is well settled that resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
