The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether Supreme Court erred in finding, as a matter of law, that plaintiff was an independent contractor and not an employee of defendant Jerry Osterhoudt (hereinafter defendant).
The record discloses the following uncontroverted facts. Plaintiff worked as a handyman performing general maintenance, construction and repair work for a variety of individuals and businesses in the City...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
