The sole issue on this appeal is whether Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying the parties' repeated requests to stipulate to mutual divorces.
The relevant facts are as follows. Plaintiff commenced an action for divorce by service and filing of a summons with notice. Despite defendant's demand for a complaint, none was served or filed as of June 25, 1997, the date on which trial commenced.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
