UGI UTILITIES, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, et al., Intervenors.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 26, 1998.
Decided June 5, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mary E. Baluss argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the briefs were Christopher J. Barr, Kent D. Murphy, Lawrence F. Barth, John F. Povilaitis and Denise Goulet. Frederick W. Peters, Michael W. Hall and Veronica A. Smith entered appearances.
Joel M. Cockrell, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jay L. Witkin, Solicitor, John H. Conway, Deputy Solicitor, and Susan J. Court, Special Counsel. Edward S. Geldermann, Janet K. Jones and Timm L. Abendroth, Attorneys, entered appearances.
James F. Bowe, Jr. argued the cause for intervenors. With him on the brief were Benga L. Farina, John H. Pickering, Joseph E. Killory, Jr., James L. Blasiak, Robert S. Fleishman, Andrew P. Mosier, Jr., Jennifer N. Waters, Stanley W. Balis, Elisabeth R. Myers-Kerbal, Kenneth E. Tawney, Marye L. Wright, Jonathan D. Schneider, James C. Beh, Richard J. Kruse, Henry S. May, Jr., Judy M. Johnson, Catherine O'Harra, Jeffrey A. Gollomp, Peter C. Lesch, John K. Keane, Jr., Telemac N. Chryssikos and Paul S. Buckley.
Before: GINSBURG, RANDOLPH and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
As a result of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's restructuring of the natural gas industry, petitioner, a natural gas company, lost the no-notice service it claims it had received from an interstate pipeline. FERC rejected petitioner's requests to require the pipeline to provide it with no-notice service and for mitigation. Because we find nothing unreasonable in FERC's decisions, we deny the petition for review.
I
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
