SLIVKINA v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER


250 A.D.2d 754 (1998)

672 N.Y.S.2d 780

Faina Slivkina, Appellant, v. County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Claire S. Meadow et al., Appellants, v. County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 18, 1998


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury's verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and we discern no reason to disturb it (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases