The issue confronting this Court is whether substantial evidence exists to support respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal's determination that petitioner, a renowned architect of international stature, was domiciled in New York in 1988. Petitioner began his architectural practice in California in the 1940s and as his practice expanded, he established offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Hawaii, Washington, D.C., and New York City.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF WARNECKE v. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
252 A.D.2d 748 (1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 286
In the Matter of John C. Warnecke, Petitioner, v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 16, 1998
July 16, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
