1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 240 A.D.2d
  5. 240 A.D.2d 725 (1997)
 

STEA v. CITY OF NEW YORK

240 A.D.2d 725 (1997)

660 N.Y.S.2d 997

Sam Stea et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 30, 1997

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We decline to disturb the Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint at the close of the evidence (see, CPLR 4401). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference, there is no rational process by which the jury could have found in their favor (see, Xenakis v Vorilas, 166 A.D.2d 586

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases