Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find unpersuasive the defendant's contention that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit testimony regarding uncharged crimes consisting of other attempted robberies. The challenged testimony was relevant to the identification of the defendant (see, People v Ventimiglia,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.