1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 108 F.3d
  5. 108 F.3d 853 (1997)
 

U.S. v. ALEXANDER

No. 90-5417.

108 F.3d 853 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ferris ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided March 10, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Haldane Weston, Beverly Hills, CA, argued (G. Randall Garrou, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant.

Paul Anthony Murphy, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, argued, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Ferris Alexander is before us again. The United States Supreme Court remanded this case for a determination of whether the forfeiture of Alexander's property under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1994), violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against excessive fines. Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544, 559, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 2776, 125...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases